Sunday, 18 December 2022

Section 49(4) Vs Rule 86B

 

                             

SECTION 49(4) Vs Rule 86B IN GST

In my opinion, Rule 86B overrides section 49(4).

As we all know Rules can’t override the sections, hence this rule is Void-ab-initio.

 

Let’s discuss in detail -

Now as per the section -

49. Payment of tax, interest, penalty and other amounts –

(4) The amount available in the electronic credit ledger may be used for making any payment towards output tax under this Act or under the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act in such manner and subject to such conditions and within such time as may be prescribed.

 

In this section, we can clearly read that utilisation of ITC is subject to Such manner, conditions & time.

Manner – Section 49A: Notwithstanding anything contained in section 49, the input tax credit on account of central tax, State tax or Union territory tax shall be utilised towards payment of integrated tax, central tax, State tax or Union territory tax, as the case may be, only after the input tax credit available on account of integrated tax has first been utilised fully towards such payment.

Section 49B: Notwithstanding anything contained in this Chapter and subject to the provisions of clause (e) and clause (f) of sub-section (5) of section 49, the Government may, on the recommendations of the Council, prescribe the order and manner of utilisation of the input tax credit on account of integrated tax, central tax, State tax or Union territory tax, as the case may be, towards payment of any such tax.”.

Subsequently, the rule 88A has been inserted to notify the above new provision via CT notification no. 16/2019 dated 29th March 2019.

Rule 88A: Order of utilization of input tax credit:- Input tax credit on account of integrated tax shall first be utilised towards payment of integrated tax, and the amount remaining, if any, may be utilised towards the payment of central tax and State tax or Union territory tax, as the case may be, in any order. Provided that the input tax credit on account of central tax, State tax or Union territory tax shall be utilised towards payment of integrated tax, central tax, State tax or Union territory tax, as the case may be, only after the input tax credit available on account of integrated tax has first been utilised fully.

 

As per the Circular No: 98/17/2019 dated 23 April 2019, it has been clarified that- As per the provisions of Section 49 of the CGST Act, credit of integrated tax has to be utilised first for payment of integrated tax, then Central tax and then State tax, in that order mandatorily.

 

This led to a situation, in certain cases, where a taxpayer has to discharge his tax liability on account of one type of tax (say State tax) through electronic cash ledger, while the input tax credit on account of other types of tax (say Central tax) remains unutilised in electronic credit ledger.

 

The newly inserted rule 88A in the CGST Rules allows utilisation of input tax credit of integrated tax towards the payment of Central tax and State tax, or as the case may be, Union Territory tax, in any order subject to the condition that the entire input tax credit on account of integrated tax is completely exhausted first before the input tax credit on account of Central tax or State/Union Territory tax can be utilised.

 

Conditions - Rule 86A – Conditions of use of amount available in electronic credit ledger

“(1) The Commissioner or an officer authorised by him in this behalf, not below the rank of an Assistant Commissioner, having reasons to believe that credit of input tax available in the electronic credit ledger has been fraudulently availed or is ineligible in as much as-

a) the credit of input tax has been availed on the strength of tax invoices or debit notes or any other document prescribed under rule 36–

     I.        issued by a registered person who has been found non-existent or not to be conducting any business from any place for which registration has been obtained; or

   II.        without receipt of goods or services or both; or

b) the credit of input tax has been availed on the strength of tax invoices or debit notes or any other document prescribed under rule 36 in respect of any supply, the tax charged in respect of which has not been paid to the Government; or

c) the registered person availing the credit of input tax has been found non-existent or not to be conducting any business from any place for which registration has been obtained; or

d) the registered person availing any credit of input tax is not in possession of a tax invoice or debit note or any other document prescribed under rule 36, may, for reasons to be recorded in writing, not allow debit of an amount equivalent to such credit in electronic credit ledger for discharge of any liability under section 49 or for claim of any refund of any unutilised amount.

 

(2) The Commissioner or the officer authorised by him under sub-rule (1) may, upon being satisfied that conditions for disallowing debit of electronic credit ledger as above, no longer exist, allow such debit.

 

(3) Such restriction shall cease to have effect after the expiry of a period of one year from the date of imposing the such restriction.”

 

Time -  After the amendment made in Section 16(4) through the Finance Act, 2022, the words “due date of furnishing of the return under section 39 for the month of September” was replaced with “Thirtieth day of November”. It means ITC can be availed till 30th November of the subsequent year.

Here Point to be noted time is given for ITC availment, not for ITC utilisation. Hence there is no time boundation on proper ITC once availed.

 

Rule 86B :  Restrictions on use of amount available in electronic credit ledger.-Notwithstanding anything contained in these rules, the registered person shall not use the amount available in electronic credit ledger to discharge his liability towards output tax in excess of ninety-nine per cent. of such tax liability, in cases where the value of taxable supply other than exempt supply and zero-rated supply, in a month exceeds fifty lakh rupees.

 

From the plain readings of both provisions, we can clearly see there is manner, condition & time given in the section to use but no word or words restriction used in the section However Rule 86B is clearly a restriction imposing on utilising of ITC, which is ultra-vires of the Section.

Author’s Opinion: Rule 86B is Void-ab-initio.

Advise Government: If my opinion is correct , Please make an amendment in section and add word restrictions(s).

Financial education for school students

    Within the framework of attending to one’s daily life, taking on financial decisions is becoming easier yet increasingly more intricat...